Accéder au contenu principal

Scammers Who Defrauded Scam Victims Barred From Scamming Anyone Else

(Tara Chavez)
Imagine you’ve been a victim of that old “woke up in a bathtub with my kidney gone” urban legend. As you stumble out of the hotel in urgent need of medical care, you come across a helpful doctor who will tend to your wounds… only to wake up in another tub with another missing organ. Replace “unauthorized donation of precious, life-sustaining organs” with “telemarketing fraud” and you’ve got the basis for a scam that took in nearly $3 million from people who had already been the victims of fraud.

The operators of a Florida-based telemarketing scam called Consumer Collection Advocates have been officially barred from making any further attempts to trick scam victims into paying more money for a service that doesn’t do anything.

The scam run by CCA, according to a complaint [PDF] filed last year by the Federal Trade Commission, worked like this:

Starting in 2011, CCA would cold-call consumers, claiming that the company ran a public service campaign that collects funds for victims of telemarketing fraud, like bogus timeshare or precious metal investments.

For an up-front fee — 20% of the amount previously lost to scammers — CCA said it would recover victims’ money. If the victim, likely already out a lot of cash because of the earlier fraud, pleaded an inability to pay the 20% fee, CCA would consider knocking it down to 10%.

CCA reps told these victims that the company could get back a substantial portion of the money they lost, and do so within 30 to 180 days.

Even if the consumer said “no thanks” to the CCA sales pitch, the company would send them a prepared contract, a limited power of attorney form, and other materials — and keep calling to make additional pitches.

Those who gave in an signed up for the CCA recovery service often found that their 10-20% fee — which ranged from a few hundred dollars to several thousand — might as well have been burned in the fireplace.

CCA, which had been so active in pursuing the customer’s business, suddenly stopped calling after it received the fee. When customers called to inquire about the status of their case, they were told that CCA needed more time.

“In numerous instances, consumers who pay the upfront fee… have not recovered the funds they lost in previous telemarketing transactions,” reads the FTC complaint. “Therefore, consumers have lost even more money on telemarketing fraud by also losing the money they spent to purchase Defendants’ recovery services.”

CCA’s unfulfilled promises that was likely to recover victims’ money in a short window of time violated the FTC Act’s prohibition against deceptive marketing.

More importantly, the Telemarketing Sales Rule bars any company from “Requesting or receiving payment of any fee or consideration from a person for goods or services represented to recover or otherwise assist in the return of money or any other item of value paid for by, or promised to, that person in a previous telemarketing transaction, until seven (7) business days after such money or other item is delivered to that person.”

Basically, even if CCA was selling a legitimate money-recovery service, the company still violated the law by demanding the upfront payment.

Today, the FTC announced that a federal court has approved a final judgment [PDF] against CCA, valued at $2.835 million.

The company and its owner are not only banned from doing any more business in the recovery services field, but also from telemarketing in general — “directly or through an intermediary, including by lead generation, consulting, brokering, investing, advising, or training.”

To pay back the $2.825 million, the court has seized and frozen seven bank accounts, and ordered CCA to turn over all customer info so that the FTC can contact victims and administer any repayments.


by Chris Morran via Consumerist

Commentaires

Posts les plus consultés de ce blog

Te souviens tu de Fanny et d'Ismael dans l'as du lycée? Fanny suit ses etudes en pharmacie en et Ismael

 İsmael de son vrai nom Hérvé Gouene et Fanny de son vrai nom Ruth Marie Hien ont bien grandit Ismael suit sa corriere dans le cinema et Fanny suit ses etudes en pharmacie.

Te souviens tu de Rai le fils de prêta ?Regarde Comment il est devenu maintenant

Rai dans "au coeur du peche" de son vrai nom Sergio Malheiro  n'est plus le petit garçon qu'on voyait dans la serie Preta. Et oui il a grandit le petit Rai car il a maintanant 24 ans  et depuis son apparition en 2004 avec le novelas "Au coeur du peche" sa carriere ne fait que grimper .Il a joue dans les serie " Totalmente Demais",   "I Love Paraisópolis"et devait notamment jouer dans des series  americaines                               

Ils decouvre que sa femme est sa sœur après plusieurs années de mariage

un internaute anonyme a écrit une lettre sur le site de Slate. Il y explique qu'après des années d'union, il a découvert que sa femme était sa soeur. Les deux amants seraient donc le fruit de la substance du même géniteur. Un généreux collaborateur d'une banque de sperme. Dans une rubrique du site Slate dédiée aux problèmes des internautes, un homme a expliqué s’être marié avec sa sœur sans le savoir.  Un père peut en cacher un autre Tout commence au lycée, l’homme tombe sous le charme d’une jeune demoiselle. Inséparables, les deux tourtereaux s’aperçoivent qu’ils ont une chose en commun : ils ont tous les deux été le fruit d’une mère lesbienne qui a été fécondée par du sperme donné dans une banque de sperme. A l’âge de 18 ans, la jeune femme décide de se renseigner sur la provenance de la substance en question. En d’autres termes, elle souhaite savoir qui est son père biologique. L’homme, lui, n’a jamais voulu le connaître. A l’âge de 30 ans, les deux amoureux se marien...